In the last month I’ve had an opportunity to speak with a number of tech investors outside the Southeast. Some well along in their careers and others just starting. I’ve noticed a consistent theme: they’re all paying VERY close attention to what’s happening in Atlanta. Some are even looking to relocate here. One seasoned investor at a reputable firm said he and his team think Atlanta is a top-five city for tech startups.

I’ve lived in Atlanta a long time. I’ve been watching the tech startup landscape evolve. I’ve always thought Atlanta is special and a great place for entrepreneurs. Now outsiders are taking notice. I think Atlanta is at a tipping point and a convergence of factors will make the city the mecca of startups and entrepreneurship (if it isn’t already). The city has logged some big fund-raising rounds and exits in the last few years. That’s putting capital in the hands of employees at local startups, who can angel invest in more emerging local companies. It’s also increasing awareness among the national investor community, who want to invest in local startups.

Working from home has more people rethinking where they want to live. Atlanta offers a unique mix of characteristics that makes it an attractive place where people can see themselves putting down roots. Working from home has also removed geographic limitations on investment. Founders in Atlanta and investors outside Atlanta no longer have to get on a plane to connect. They can meet and close deals on video. There are a ton of other factors too, but these are some big ones.

Atlanta has always had scrappy founders who’ve done amazing things. I think local founders will continue to see the resources and knowledge available to them expand as the profile of the Atlanta ecosystem continues to increase. This can only accelerate their success and allow them to pursue bigger and bolder ideas. I’m excited to see all this come to fruition!

For many years I never thought about my title at CCAW. When people asked, I called myself the president. In truth, I was focused on moving the company forward and didn’t much care about a title. For some reason “CEO” never sat well with me, so I settled on president.

Today I had an enlightening conversation with other founders about titles. Here are a few takeaways:

• External vs. internal – Most internal people know who’s doing what, but others don’t. For this reason, titles (or the impressions they create) matter to outsiders.
• Business partners – Having co-founders adds another element to things. The distinction of an appropriate title is great, but defining in writing who’s responsible for what is the key to accountability, which is essential.
• Title sharing – Some founders share a title with their business partner. Think co-CEO. It’s uncommon, but it can help with transition planning. It gives a rising person the opportunity to learn under the mentorship of a person transitioning out. They can work side-by-side for a while, smoothing the transition.
• Responsibility – Titles are important to some people, and there’s nothing wrong with that. It’s only a negative when they lose sight of or don’t understand their responsibilities. Understanding your role in the company is step number one in setting yourself up for success. Focus on that.

Today’s conversation was great, and I loved hearing other people’s ideas. I’m still not much of a title person, but it changed how I think about this topic. My key takeaway is that what’s being asked of you is more important than what you’re called.

This week, I’ve listened to two founders who are targeting enterprise companies as customers. One, “Alan,” landed a major one with no product and a pitch deck. The other, “ Bob,” has a working product but hasn’t yet been able to persuade anyone to use his platform (which is great, by the way). The big difference? Relationships.

Alan has years of experience and relationships with people who trust him. He leveraged them to land his first customer. Bob is solving a problem in a space where he doesn’t have relationships or experience. He has to earn the trust of potential customers, and that takes time. Alan has founder–market fit; Bob doesn’t. This doesn’t mean Bob won’t be successful; it just means he may have a tougher journey. I learned this lesson the hard way when I was a founder.

Many factors increase or decrease the chance of success. Founder–market fit is one of them. If you’re an aspiring founder with an idea but no founder–market fit, ask yourself if you’re the right person to solve the problem. If you believe you are, forge ahead!

Today I attended Outlander Labs’ Speaker Series. This month’s speaker was Hamet Watt. He has a diverse background that includes being a venture capitalist and entrepreneur. He’s currently CEO of Share Ventures, a venture studio, and used to be co-founder and chair of MoviePass. Here are a few takeaways from today’s conversation:

• Harmony vs. consensus – Harmony on a team is good. It means people respect each other’s opinions. Consensus in decision-making ends in watered-down decisions. The drive to consensus smooths the sharp edge that’s needed for a good idea or decision to get traction.
• Instincts vs. conviction – Founders need great instincts more than they need conviction. If they don’t have good instincts, they’ll be convinced of the wrong things.
• Energy – It’s important for founders to manage their energy. Sometimes you have to sprint . . . but to finish the race, you must pace yourself. You need to be able to continue running even after hearing “no” over and over again. Hamet views this as a mostly mental trait.
• Prioritization – People who ruthlessly prioritize to get things done make good founders. They understand everything won’t get done, but they’re sure to complete mission-critical tasks.
• Conversations – Investors want to have conversations; they don’t want to be pitched. Investors are human beings who want to partner with people. Hard to do that if communication isn’t bidirectional.
• Ideal investor – Founders should look for investors who allow them to be themselves. It’s easier over the long haul to work with someone who accepts you and sees your personality as a strength.

Hamet has a unique perspective on things and it was interesting to hear him explain it. He also shared an interesting story from his MoviePass days.

I’m excited for Hamet and Share Ventures and can’t wait to see the businesses he helps start!

This past weekend, I had an issue with an expensive product I purchased a year ago. I was frustrated that it was defective and worried it might be out of warranty. I called their customer service number on Saturday morning and had a pretty good experience. I sent a few pictures while I was on the call. The rep offered to send me a replacement free of charge and alternatively gave me the option to upgrade to the latest product for a small upcharge. In the end, happy they stood by their product, I decided to upgrade.

A lot of companies focus on getting the customer and closing the deal. I’m of the opinion that how you treat the customer post-transaction is equally as important. Giving your customers a satisfying experience after the deal is how you establish loyalty and turn them into evangelists. In my situation, this company has probably gained a customer for life because of the way they resolved my problem. That’s what I’ll remember, not the problem.

Regardless of the stage of your company, remember to treat your customers well after the sale. Doing so will help you build a base of loyal repeat customers you can count on!

A founder once asked me a question that caught me off guard: “Did you have trouble sleeping when you were building your company?” As soon as he finished asking the question, I knew exactly where the conversation was headed. “Yes,” I said. He told me he’d started waking up in the middle of the night thinking about his company and had a hard time going back to sleep.

He’s not the only one. When my company began to grow rapidly, I started waking up in the middle of the night. At first I didn’t pay much attention to it, but eventually I noticed a pattern. I’d be exhausted from a long day and go to bed at a normal time. I’d sleep hard and then wake up around 3 or 4 with my mind racing. My thoughts usually revolved around two things. One was whatever I was most worried about . . . the thing that might sink my company. The other was ideas. It was weird, but I’d have a burst of ideas when I’d awaken in the middle of the night.

Sometimes I was able to go back to sleep and sometimes I wasn’t. Eventually, I realized that not getting enough sleep wasn’t good for me and was affecting my productivity during the day. I decided to do something about it. I researched sleep (including mattresses) and began working out again. I created the ideal sleep setup (or so I thought), and I had an outlet for stress and a regularly scheduled time when I couldn’t think about work (or I’d drop a weight on my foot). I eventually began sleeping through the night again. My energy level and productivity increased.

During that period, I asked a few founder friends if they ever woke up in the middle of the night. I was surprised to learn that a lot of them did. How they dealt with it varied, but the theme was consistent: they’d be thinking about their company as they lay awake in bed.

I’m not a sleep expert, so I can’t give advice about sleep to founders. I will say that I slept better and was a more productive founder when my routine included two things: scheduled time to release stress and intense focus on something besides my company. The latter is harder to achieve. Luckily, working out checked both boxes for me.

Many years ago, I was explaining what my company did to a good friend. All she knew was that I was an entrepreneur building a business. My explanation included details about the industry and lots of industry jargon. At the end of it, she said, “I don’t really understand what all that means or what you do, but it sounds cool. I hope it turns out well for you.”

This week I spoke with a founder who made the same mistake. After listening to him pitch his company, I still wasn’t exactly sure what it did. Conveying what you do in simple terms is important, and it’s usually a sign of a strong founder. Making it easy to understand what your company does and how it creates value for customers is the first step in getting people to support it.

All those years ago, when I heard my friend’s feedback, I backed up and rephrased. “We help connect consumers to hard-to-find auto parts using technology.” That time, she got it! And she gave me the names of a few people she thought I should connect with who could help my business.

If you’re a founder or considering entrepreneurship, make sure others can understand what you do. If they don’t, simplify it.

‍

A few months ago, I met with a founder who asked my opinion on the current state of his company. I said the salaries he was offering were large for an early-stage startup. The people earning them were qualified and deserving, but the company couldn’t afford-big corporation salaries. It was burning too much money every month and needed to double or triple for that level of payroll to make sense. I told him that I projected he would need to either reduce salaries or raise cash.

I caught up with him this week. He told me that he’d just survived a near-death experience. The company is still growing, but the high payroll caused him to run dangerously low on cash. He reduced his team’s salaries, parted ways with some team members, and raised emergency capital. Doing all of that at once was painful and stressful for him and his investors. It taught him to make a point of having a good sense of the trajectory of his company at all times and to make tough decisions early to avoid getting so close to the abyss.

I never raised outside capital for CCAW, but I did have near-death experiences. I concur with this founder: try not to let this happen. They’re awful. They took a toll on my team and me. Some are unavoidable and you have to do the best you can with the hand you’ve been dealt. (A global pandemic comes to mind.) Others are entirely avoidable.

Founders should always have a finger on the pulse of their company. If this isn’t one of their strengths, they should have at least one person on the team who can fill this gap. It sounds crazy, but so much happens so quickly that it’s not unheard of to wake up and realize you’re almost out of cash. The company’s heart just stops beating, and it may be too late to resuscitate it.

‍

I was working with a founder on his pitch.  He had a big vision and was passionate, but he needed to fine-tune his delivery. Over the course of our conversations, I realized something. There was a disconnect. How he perceived himself and what others saw was different. He thought his presentation sounded one way, but it actually sounded quite different. Seeing is believing, so I suggested he record his next pitch and send me the recording.

By the next time we spoke, he’d had a realization. He said he’d had no idea how he sounded. With the recording, he could self-critique and correct the part of his delivery he didn’t like.  The recording was the pitch version of looking at himself in the mirror. He saw exactly what everyone else saw.

We decided to take it a step further. Instead of booking time with peers to get their feedback, he sent them links to his recorded pitch. This worked well for a few reasons. First, it forced him to put his best self forward. Who doesn’t watch a video of themselves before sending it to other people? No one. He watched the pitch, redid it, and got it to sound exactly how he wanted before clicking “send.” Second, the recipients could watch it and send their feedback whenever it was convenient for them. And third, he was able to share his pitch with more people and get more feedback than if he’d scheduled one-on-one time with each person.

Recording yourself isn’t novel. It’s a time-tested tool that’s still highly effective. If you want to perfect your pitch, consider tapping “record”!

I recently had an idea I was super excited about. I’ve been considering how to help more entrepreneurs accelerate their success, and I’d only come up with a few ideas that were essentially tweaks of something others have done. When I decided to look at the problem from a different angle, this new idea occurred to me. I was excited about it, but I knew there was a lot I hadn’t thought about. My instinct was to flesh it out more before talking about it. But I soon remembered that I’d taken that approach before, and it was wrong.

I decided to share the idea with a few credible people, and I’m glad I did. These were conceptual conversations, since I hadn’t done a ton of research. Some of the feedback was very positive. Others felt there was value in doing what I was talking about. I already felt good about the idea, and this feedback boosted my confidence. It energized me and made me want to continue to share it. Next, I received feedback from someone intimately knowledgeable about the space. It was more along the lines of “This is an interesting idea. Have you considered X, though?” This person zeroed in on something that might have taken me months to realize and was kind enough to share his wisdom. I appreciate his feedback.

The idea is still just that. An idea. But I’m glad I didn’t hold it close to my chest. These conversations helped me adjust my thinking, made me aware of my blind spots, and boosted my confidence about the idea. I’m not sure where this will end up, but one thing is certain: I’ll continue to share the idea as it evolves.