2/26/25 Update: I created a page with all 52 books I read last year. See it here.

2/27/25 Update: I’ve created a searchable library of every book I’ve read and update it weekly. See it here.

This summer, I set a goal of creating 100 podcasts about books I was reading. It forced me to start tracking my reading in a spreadsheet. It’s nerdy, but it was necessary because every week, I read a book, wrote a blog post series, and created a podcast series about each book. The spreadsheet helped me keep everything organized. I paused the latter two after the summer because they were too inefficient and time-consuming, but I kept updating the spreadsheet and reading a book a week.

I looked at the spreadsheet as I was reflecting on the books I read in 2024. I figured I’d share some stats and learnings.

High-level stat for 2024:

• Books read: 52

2024 breakdown by month:

• January: 0 (I did read, but I can’t remember what books)
• February: 2
• March: 6
• April: 6
• May: 7
• June: 5
• July: 4
• August: 5
• September: 4
• October: 3
• November: 5
• December: 5

Here are a few things I learned along the way:

• Reading two books a week was too aggressive. I tried it in the March–May period, but I wasn’t absorbing as much of what I was reading or making as many connections. I was focused on finishing the books, which isn’t why I read. The pace was too fast, so I reduced it to a book a week, which feels more sustainable.
• Sharing what I learned from my reading was the big unlock. It took my learning and thinking to another level. Writing a blog post series and recording a podcast series forced me to identify insights and organize and communicate my thinking. The key tool in that process was creating a digest of each book, which was an extraction of the information I found important in each chapter, along with my insights.
• E-readers, such as Kindles, are great devices, but I prefer reading physical books. I highlight and add notes about insightful sections and ideas in the books. Those highlights and notes are trapped in each book, so finding and using them later is difficult. See here for more. As I’ve read more, this has become a painful problem. Trying to find something sometimes means reviewing several books’ notes and highlights. Experiencing this pain led me to several feature ideas for the “book library.”
• Reading a book is simple—but learning from what I read is more involved. It’s inefficient and involves lots of steps. The process of sharing what I learn from my reading is complex. It’s hard and has many steps and lots of moving pieces. This realization led me to add several more feature ideas to the “book library.”
• The value in reading lots of entrepreneurial biographies is that you’re exposed to the best ideas and experiences of entrepreneurs, and you can pull from them when you’re faced with a problem. The challenge is that this requires a great memory or knowing exactly where to look to quickly find something you’ve read. I don’t have a photographic memory, and I don’t always remember where I read something. I want to make it easy to find what I’ve read, which will be a big part of the “book library” MVP.
• My best ideas in 2024 came from piecing ideas together from various books. Making those connections was a great way to build upon what other entrepreneurs figured out. Solving a problem by building upon the knowledge of others rather than starting from scratch led to my having better ideas. I’m not an idea guy, so this was perfect for me, and I want to do more of it going forward. I don’t think this has to be completely manual and inefficient. Figuring out how to solve this and incorporate it into the “book library” is challenging, but I think it can be done, and I’m excited to figure this out because it’ll be a huge unlock for myself and others.

Those are my takeaways and reading stats for 2024!

A friend shared Stripe and OpenAI’s new Agentic Commerce Protocol (ACP) with me. ACP is an open-source interaction model and an open standard that lets buyers, AI agents, and businesses complete purchases. Translation: ACP will enable buyers and sellers to complete purchases, using AI agents, within an “AI surface” (think apps like ChatGPT).

As I understand it, when a buyer wants to purchase within a chat app, an AI agent works with them, showing products, offering checkout, and collecting payment. The business receives order details and payment information from the AI agent and can accept or decline the transaction. The AI agent facilitates payment via the business’s payment provider and sends payment details via a secure token (I assume after the buyer accepts the transaction), which the business can use to charge the buyer. If all goes well, the buyer can check out instantly via an app like ChatGPT without ever leaving it. It’s a seamless experience.

This is interesting stuff that could really change how commerce is done. It’s brand new, and I’m curious to learn more about it and follow its development. If you want to learn more, you can read Stripe’s blog announcement here and visit the ACP website (which links its GitHub) here.

In 2024, I challenged myself to accelerate my learning by reading a book (usually a biography) a week. To date, I’ve done it for 85 consecutive weeks. I wanted to share what I was reading and also keep track for myself, which was difficult (see here), so I created a Library section on this site. I added to it all the books I’ve read since my book-a-week habit began in March 2024, and I’ve committed to adding my latest read to the Library every Sunday (see the latest here).

That left the books I’d read before 2024 unshared and untracked. I set a goal to add my old reading to the Library over time. It began with a Memorial Day Challenge to add five books (see here) and continued with by challenging myself to add two books every weekend until my backlog is gone. Last month (see here), I decided to up the pace so I can finish this project well before the holidays—and begin another one!

The backlog is finally gone. This past weekend was my twentieth and final weekend, and I added the last two books:

• Liar's Poker by Michael Lewis
• Business Adventures by John Brooks

That’s the latest and final update for this weekend project. I’m glad I took this project on. It forced me to revisit tons of books, which jogged my memory.  I hope that sharing these books will add value to others.

Current Project: Reading books about entrepreneurs and sharing what I learned from them

Mission: Create a library of wisdom from notable entrepreneurs that current entrepreneurs can leverage to increase their chances of success

Cumulative metrics (since 4/1/24):

• Total books read: 85
• Total blog posts published: 560

This week’s metrics:

• Books read: 1
• Blog posts published: 7

What I completed in the week ending 10/19/25 (link to the previous week’s commitments):

• Read Think Twice, a framework to improve decision-making in complex and uncertain environments by Michael J. Mauboussin
• Added two more books to the library on this site; these, which I read in 2017 and 2016, were about Michael Lewis’s time as a Salomon Brothers bond trader in the 1980s and 12 business case studies on how human behavior in stressful times shapes decision and outcomes

What I’ll do next week:

• Read a biography, autobiography, or framework book
• Pick my next weekend project and start working on it

Asks:

• No ask this week

Week two hundred ninety was another week of learning. Looking forward to next week!

Current Project: Reading books about entrepreneurs and sharing what I learned from them

Mission: Create a library of wisdom from notable entrepreneurs that current entrepreneurs can leverage to increase their chances of success

What I struggled with:

• No material struggles last week

What I learned:

• I learned about Kidlin’s law last week. It states that if you write a problem down clearly, then the matter is half solved. This really stuck with me, and I’ve been thinking about it all week. I’ll share my thoughts on this in the upcoming days.

That’s what I learned and struggled with last week.

I’m excited about this weekend. I’m on pace to finish adding all the books I’ve read to my library. I’ve been working on this weekend project for about six months. It’s been fulfilling, but I’m ready to finish it and move on to the next thing.

More importantly, this weekend I’ll need to choose what my next weekend project will be. I’m considering a few ideas. The one constraint I’ve been thinking about is that it should be something I can finish in one to four months. One month would mean a commitment over multiple weeks that requires consistent effort. And at most, it won’t require more than 16 or so weeks of consistent effort. Surprisingly, that constraint is making it harder to pick the next project.

Regardless, this will be a good weekend. I’ll get to celebrate finishing something I began half a year ago and start something new I’m excited about working on for at least a month.

This past week, I reread Expectations Investing by Michael Mauboussin and Alfred Rappaport. The book is an advanced value-investing framework that investors can apply to public companies to understand price relative to expected value. I read the book this summer. The framework made sense at a high level, but it had many moving parts that left me less confident that I could actually apply it and understand the expectations implied in a public company’s stock price. I wanted to try using the framework right after reading the book, but I never got around to it.

So, I reread the book this month, focusing heavily on my highlights and notes from the first reading. I then spent time building a model for a public company I follow. After several days of part-time effort, I finally finished it. After finishing the model and reviewing the output, I have a new appreciation for this book and the expectations-investing framework. It’s definitely something I’ll use going forward.

One of my big takeaways was that although the framework seemed daunting at first, after working through it (and getting stuck several times), I better understood its component parts. Lots of intertwining formulas. Required data from external sources. And several other moving parts. More importantly, I was able to simplify some of the more complex calculations, such as the Perpetuity with Inflation method for estimating continuing value. Said differently, going through the steps of building a model and applying the framework helped me understand it deeply and figure out ways to simplify it.

I’m glad I reread this book and applied the framework. It deepened my learning and took my understanding of this framework to the next level.

In 2024, I challenged myself to accelerate my learning by reading a book (usually a biography) a week. To date, I’ve done it for 84 consecutive weeks. I wanted to share what I was reading and also keep track for myself, which was difficult (see here), so I created a Library section on this site. I added to it all the books I’ve read since my book-a-week habit began in March 2024, and I’ve committed to adding my latest read to the Library every Sunday (see the latest here).

That left the books I’d read before 2024 unshared and untracked. I set a goal to add my old reading to the Library over time. It began with a Memorial Day Challenge to add five books (see here) and continued by challenging myself to add two books every weekend until my backlog is gone. Last month (see here), I decided to up the pace so I can finish this project well before the holidays—and begin another one!

This past weekend was my nineteenth weekend, and I added five more books:

• The Buy Side by Turney Duff
• Black Edge by Sheelah Kolhatkar
• Barbarians at the Gate by Bryan Burrough and John Helyar
• The Luck Factor by Dr. Richard Wiseman
• Chaos Monkeys by Antonio Garcia Martinez

That’s the latest update on my weekend goal. I hope that sharing these books will be of value.

This week, I caught up with a founder who’s out of runway. He raised several million dollars from VCs to fund the company for four years. After several pivots, they found a product that customers love and are paying for. But they don’t have enough cash left to accelerate the search for enough customers to reach cash-flow breakeven. Investors aren’t willing to invest additional funds.

He shared with me his biggest learning from his four-year experience:

Bootstrap as long as possible before raising venture capital. Being low on funds forces you to be laser focused on problems customers are willing to pay to solve. After you build a solution and customers are paying for it, raise capital to scale it. Raising a ton of cash too early increases the risk of building nice-to-have solutions rather than solutions to truly painful problems. A nice-to-have is like a faulty foundation under your house. You’re constantly trying to fix it, but that’s hard to do because of all the stuff on top of it.

Every founder’s situation is different, but I do agree that too many resources too early can lead to a lack of focus. When resources constrain you, you’re forced to focus only on what truly matters and what customers will actually pay for. Focus fixes everything, and constraints force you to focus.

Venture capital firms have a dilemma: there’s no exit for their founders. I read about Georges Doriot’s VC firm, American Research and Development Corporation, being publicly traded (see here). But being a public company ended up causing issues, and Doriot merged the firm with a conglomerate in 1972. Since then, VC firms have been private, and there hasn’t been a market for buying or selling them.

Today, that changed. I read this article, which says that Goldman Sachs is buying Industry Ventures (IV) for a reported $665 million plus an additional $300 million based on performance. IV has about $7 billion in assets under management. This is interesting because VC firms weren’t considered assets that could be sold. Their founders’ wealth came from carry (profit-sharing) and management fees.

I’m curious to learn about the details of this transaction and see how the market reacts to it. If VC firms become assets that can be bought and sold, I imagine we’ll see a shift in the strategies and actions of founding partners of VC firms.